Once again it looks like the RPV is up to it’s old tricks. On November 20th the State Central Committee is planning to decide on Primary vs Convention and with a possible vote reminiscent of the 5th district debacle looming it may not workout so well for Liberty.
George Allen is the anointed favorite of the establishment trash that is overdue for a takeout to the dumpster.
This letter has been making the rounds and is worth sharing. There are others in the RPV at the unit level that are fed up, so there is still hope.
Dear State Central Member,
My name is Russ Moulton, a long-time conservative Republican Party activist, and former 1st District GOP Chairman. I was George Allen’s Fredericksburg Area Coordinator for his successful 1993 Convention campaign for our Gubernatorial Nomination, and was a delegate for Bob Marshall’s unsuccessful US Senate nomination bid at the 2008 Convention. I have not committed to either candidate in the upcoming 2012 Senate nomination contest, and, who knows, we may see additional candidates emerge. It is still quite early.
I am alarmed at what I have learned is happening in advance of the November 20th State Central Committee meeting:
– A few SCC members aligned with one candidate (George Allen) are rushing the SCC to vote Novembers 20th on the method of nomination for 2012 – when most members believed this vote would occur in March or even June 2011, after all nomination method options had been explored, party plan amendments decided, and full information gathered, and deliberated.
– George Allen and Vice Chairman Mike Thomas have been calling State Central Members quietly to lobby them to vote for a Primary at the Nov 20th meeting. While I like and deeply respect Mike, he is a well-known Allen-booster. Word is they have already “lined up their votes” and a Primary is a “fait accompli” – without the direct, open deliberation of Party leaders.
As you are probably aware, it is universally accepted that a Primary works to the great advantage of one candidate (George Allen), and thus why he would ask SCC to give him a Primary.
This sort of Party establishment favoritism, back-room dealing and manipulation is precisely the sort of thing the Tea Party rails against. They are tired of the status quo in our politics.
The Tea Party is already disappointed with our Party for the big domestic spending during the Bush years, and by association, George’s time in the Senate during those years. We do not need to hurt George with the Tea Party by furthering his perception as the establishment candidate, with Party insiders handing him the nomination via a Primary.
In fact, several Tea Party leaders at the recent Tea Party Convention in Richmond let George know in no uncertain terms their desire for a Convention for 2012.
Our State Central Committee is elected by the grass-roots of our Party, which includes the Tea Party. Let’s not rush a vote on a 2012 method of nomination at the Nov 20th State Central meeting. Let’s get our input from the grass roots that elected us — not react and rush things in response to a request by one candidate. Let’s defer this vote until we’ve properly considered everything, perhaps deciding at the March or June 2011 meeting.
Russ Moulton
Dear Fellow Member of the State Central Committee:
I am writing to lay out for you why I believe we should adopt a Primary as the method by which to nominate our candidate for the United States Senate in 2012. The case for doing so is compelling, and we stand to lose an opportunity to bring hundreds of thousands of conservative and pro-family activists into the party by adopting a process that includes them, rather than one that shuts them out.
Many of my friends have been surprised by my position on this. Indeed, this will be the first time in my approximately 27 years as a member of the State Central Committee that I have not voted for a convention, other than when our candidate was an incumbent (and we had no choice) or when we had a presumptive nominee, as with Jerry Kilgore in 2005.
Virtually all of you know of my strong support over the last three years for seeking approval to re-instate delegate registration fees so that a State convention is a viable choice for us to have. And, I have talked with many of you personally about why I hope we adopt this amendment at our meeting on Saturday.
Further, most of you will not be surprised to know that I made sure notice of the consideration of our nominating process was included in the call, even though the Party Plan doesn’t require notice for such a decision and no notice was given before the adoption of the 2009 convention.
Now for the reasons we ought to choose a Primary for our 2012 Senate nomination:
1. We are in an extraordinary time in our country’s modern history. In the last 18 months, hundreds of thousands of concerned Virginians have been waking up to what is going on in this country. They were roused to get involved in the political process, to attend Town Hall meetings, run for office or support other candidates, get others to register to vote, form a local organization or join an existing one, and get out to vote in huge numbers. This activism is only going to increase over the next two years.
Our largest two State conventions ever, in 1994 and 1993, had approximately 14,000 and 12,000 delegates respectively. Compare that to the roughly 6,000 delegates who showed up to the 2009 convention, or the less than 3,000 who voted to nominate our U.S. Senate candidate in 2008.
Think about it. In the very year that we want most to engage new and/or re-energized conservative votersa and Tea Party activists, we can either adopt a process that will invite 300,000 – 400,000 or more conservatives to participate, or we can keep our familiar, comfortable – and exclusive – convention process that shuts out hundreds of thousands of conservative voters and Tea Party activists.
I not only think that it is wrong politically to shut out the vast majority of the grassroots activists who should have a chance to vote on our nominee, but it is also wrong to intentionally adopt a process so that just a few party leaders can control the outcome.
I have very good friends who would support a convention no matter what, because it is what they are most comfortable with. And, for intra-party business, I think it is most appropriate. But, the fact is that we will grow as a conservative party only by bringing in more activists, not by trying to keep as many people out of our nomination process as possible.
2. Not only is a Primary desirable for the reasons stated above, it is also necessary if we actually want to win in the general election. It seems clear that the only way that President Obama can win re-election is if he carries Virginia’s 13 Electoral Votes. To do that, the Democrats will pull out all the stops to get their base out to the polls on Electon Day. They will be devoting as many, if not more, resources to Virginia than they did in 2008 to make that happen.
If we are going to win, we must begin early to engage not just thousands, but hundreds of thousands of conservative voters and build enthusiam on a scale that just is not possible with a convention.
And we don’t want to just carry Virginia for our Presidential candidate. We want and need to win this Senate seat. If we are serious about re-capturing the Senate seat, we can’t presume that these conservative voters will sit by patiently while party insiders decide what’s best for them.
3. As much as you and I may see it as our duty to participate no matter what process is chosen, the fact is that most Virginians who want to participate just can’t come to a convention, even if there is no required registration fee.
Some of my dearest friends from church, among the most conservative people that I know, can’t come to a convention because they own their own business or simply can’t be away from their young children. As I have been thinking through where we need to head in the future, it occured to me that some of our strongest allies, those whom we count on in November, just can’t participate in a convention process. Among them:
Active Duty Servicemen and Servicewomen
Older Republicans whose are not physically able to come to a convention
Thousands of small business owners, especially sole proprietors
Republicans for whom Saturdays are the Sabbath
Thousands of familes with young children (some can participate in a convention, but most just cannot)
Hundreds, if not thousands, of law enforcement officers whose rotation falls on a Saturday
It was when I considered just how many people we leave out by having a closed process that I began to think seriously about supporting a Primary.
4. Other attractive options are just too far down the road. Every member of State Central knows how long I pushed, with the help of many others, to change our Party Plan to allow an option for a statewide Party Canvass. I truly believe that a Party Canvass will become the prefered method of nomination in a few years.
We are in the beginning stages of developing the calls and rules that will be necessary to conduct one. Optimistically, this is likely a 6 – 8 month process, and realistically may take longer. We need to do it right and get buy-in from Republicans accross Virginia before we adopt them. If we don’t, it is highly unlikely that the State Central Committee would ever vote to nominate a statewide candidate using that process. Once all of this work is completed, we will have to submit these calls and rules to the Department of Justice for pre-clearance under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. As much as I would like to tell you something different, it is hard to see how a Party Canvass will be realistic before 2014.
This has been a long note and I will add other points separately. But, I do want to wrap it up with one additional thought.
A few of my friends have suggested that we should wait until sometime next year to make this decision. I disagree. We only have a choice between a Primary and a Convention.
If we are to nominate by convention, then we will need to secure the venue soon. Delaying a decision only increases the chance that we will end up without a venue, and thus it will be a moot point to even discuss having a convention. (And, if we choose not to nominate our candidate in a convention, we will have numerous sites across the Commonwealth to choose from for electing our State Chairman, National Committee members, Elector and At-Large Delegates to the National COnvention in 2012.)
On the other hand, if we adopt a Primary, why would we not want to give prospective candidates the extra months to begin building their campaigns, activating thousands of volunteers who can also be mobilized to help elect our legislative, Constitutional and local candidates in 2011?
Finally, the longer we wait to make this decision, the more likely that the decision will be based not upon what is good for the cause, but what is good for one candidate or another. We always say we don’t want to make a decision based on candidates’ preferences for a nomination method, then we turn right around and wait until it’s too late to do anything but. If we wait, we will again be in that same position.
In the end, however, we need to adopt a Primary now because it is the right thing for our Party and for the advancement of our shared conservative principles.
As always, I look forward to seeing you this weekend and sincerely appreciate your consideration.
You are the best!
Mike Thomas
The REAL reason for a primary is that they ALWAYS favor the establishment pick. What the RPV is afraid of and why they are rushing this process is because of the ground swell of activism at the county unit level. They have seen a massive number of their loyalist band thrown out of leadership here in the fifth. They know that true conservatives are marching for a complete takeover of the RPV and they want to solidify their position before that happens.
If they think that anointing their candidate will make us all just bow down and lick the masters boot they have another thing coming. The Tea Party will not be used an then tossed aside. If they think they can put another disaster candidate forward and expect us to all jump for joy at the prospect they’ve got another thing coming.
On Nov. 2, the American electorate signed the restraining order against the Obama Administration’s hostile assault on personal liberties, the financial futures of unborn generations and destruction of the constitutional foundation of this Republic. The results are certainly cause for breathing a sigh of relief, but not to begin a lavish celebration. This goes double for the Republicans. It would be a gross mistake to convince themselves they are the champions of limited government, fiscal responsibility and constitutional governance. They need to understand that the American electorate sees this Republic as the victim of a horrible drunk driving accident. The bloodied and broken victim has arrived at the emergency room hopefully in time to receive critically needed lifesaving treatment. The victim is hemorrhaging profusely, and the election victory of Republican candidates is simply an attempt to slow the bleeding, and get the victim hooked up to life support. So much damage has been done that difficult and painful procedures will be necessary to save the patient. Does the Republican Party understand they are only a tourniquet? It is evident many of the newly-elected Freshmen do understand this. Many campaigned on it. However, the question remains as to the entrenched GOP establishment.